From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Alamgir

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 9, 2019
No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 9, 2019)

Opinion

No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 125 DB 2004

04-09-2019

In the Matter of MOHAMED ALAMGIR PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT


Attorney Registration No. 65321 (Out of State) ORDER PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the parties' responses to the Court's rule to show cause dated January 11, 2019, the rule is made absolute, and the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).


Summaries of

In re Alamgir

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 9, 2019
No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 9, 2019)
Case details for

In re Alamgir

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MOHAMED ALAMGIR PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 9, 2019

Citations

No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Apr. 9, 2019)