From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.K.A.

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Mar 27, 2014
No. 10-13-00424-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-13-00424-CV

03-27-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.A., A CHILD


From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-2340-3


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal was referred to mediation on January 9, 2014. An agreed motion to reverse and render judgment as to attorney's fees and to dismiss the appeal was filed on March 5, 2014. The motion was signed by all parties.

Because we cannot reverse and render a judgment and then dismiss the appeal, we will seek to accomplish the same objective using a different procedure. The agreed motion is granted in part. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).

The portion of the trial court's Order, signed on October 29, 2013, which provides:

The judgment, for which let execution issue, is awarded against QUINCY J. ACY, and QUINCY J. ACY is ORDERED to pay the fees to Spring R.
Thummel at 3640 West Waco Drive, Waco, Texas 76710 by cash, cashier's check, or money order on or before the 30th day following the entry of this order. Spring R. Thummel may enforce this judgment for fees in the attorney's own name by any means available for the enforcement of a judgment for debt.
is reversed; and judgment is rendered as follows:
MORGHAN V. MEDLOCK hereby assumes any and all financial responsibility relating to the $2,000 award and enforcement of attorney's fees. The Order in the amount of $2,000 shall be timely paid by Appellee, MORGHAN V. MEDLOCK, to Spring Thummel at 3640 West Waco Drive, Waco, Texas 76710 by cash, cashier's check, or money order on or before the 30th day following the entry of this judgment.
The trial court's order signed on October 29, 2013 is otherwise affirmed.

Because the Court was unable to grant the entirety of the parties' motion, the Court has endeavored to implement the substance of the parties' agreed motion and Rule 11 agreement to achieve the same result. If the parties determine that the judgment of the Court does not accomplish the parties' intended result, a timely motion for rehearing must be filed which addresses the manner in which the Court can implement the agreement of the parties within the limitations of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Reversed and rendered in part and affirmed in part
[CV06]


Summaries of

In re A.K.A.

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Mar 27, 2014
No. 10-13-00424-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)
Case details for

In re A.K.A.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A.K.A., A CHILD

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Mar 27, 2014

Citations

No. 10-13-00424-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)