From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Air Crash at Taipei

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 8, 2004
01-ML-1394-GAF (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2004)

Opinion

          Rod D. Margo, Frank A. Silane, Scott D. Cunningham, Debby L. Zajac, CONDON & FORSYTH LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendant SINGAPORE AIRLINES, LTD.

          Brian J. Panish, Kevin R. Boyle, GREENE, BROILLET, PANISH & WHEELER, LLP, Santa Monica, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.


          FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION RE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

          GARY FEESS, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs Varaprasad Somasekhara Koppaka and Rama Koppaka and defendant Singapore Airlines, Ltd. ("SIA"), through their respective counsel of record, that the pretrial preparation schedule previously agreed upon by the parties be amended and approved by the Court as follows:

         Description Proposed Date Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures June 12, 2004 SIA's Rule 26 Disclosures June 14, 2004 Completion of all expert witness depositions June 17, 2004 Motions in Limine June 18, 2004 Oppositions to Motions In Limine June 25, 2004 Trial June 30, 2004

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Air Crash at Taipei

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 8, 2004
01-ML-1394-GAF (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2004)
Case details for

In re Air Crash at Taipei

Case Details

Full title:IN RE AIR CRASH AT TAIPEI, TAIWAN ON OCTOBER 31, 2000. v. Singapore…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 8, 2004

Citations

01-ML-1394-GAF (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2004)