From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ahaila S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 2006-02922, 2006-02923, 2006-02924, (Docket Nos. B-33833-03, B-33834-03, B-33835-03).

June 12, 2007.

In three related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of three orders of fact-finding and disposition (one as to each child), of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), all dated November 7, 2005, as, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that she was unable to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children by reason of her mental illness, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject children to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption.

Warren Warren, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Ira L. Eras of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Covello and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that orders are reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing in accordance herewith and new determination thereafter.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Family Court failed to comply with the procedure set forth in the statute for the taking of expert testimony by a psychiatrist or psychologist in a parental rights termination case. Social Services Law § 384-b (6) (e) provides that in every termination of parental rights proceeding with a mental illness cause of action, "the judge shall order the parent to be examined by, and shall take the testimony of, a qualified psychiatrist or a psychologist." In the present case, the psychology expert who testified to the mother's mental illness did not examine the mother, but based his testimony entirely upon examination of the agency and hospital records. Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing in accordance herewith and a new determination thereafter.


Summaries of

In re Ahaila S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Ahaila S

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHONICA AHAILA S., Also known as SHONICA S. MERCYFIRST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5282
840 N.Y.S.2d 78

Citing Cases

Schenectady Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Simone J. (In re Rahsaan I.)

Because the statutory exception does not apply, Family Court lacked authority to determine the legal…

In re Rahsaan I.

Because the statutory exception does not apply, Family Court lacked authority to determine the legal…