In re A.G.F.W.

5 Citing cases

  1. In re T.M.R.

    No. 05-23-01175-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2024)

    (mem. op.) (citing In re A.G.F.W., No. 06-12-00111-CV, 2013 WL 2459886, at *3 (Tex. App.- Texarkana Jun. 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.)).

  2. Optio Sols., LLC v. Ying Peng

    No. 05-19-00384-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2020)

    Business records filed with the clerk pursuant to Rule of Evidence 902(10) must be offered into evidence and admitted by the trial court to be considered on appeal. See In re A.G.F.W., No. 06-12-00111-CV, 2013 WL 2459886, at *3 (Tex. App.—Texarkana June 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.). Because the trial court did not admit the business records affidavit and the attached records, we cannot consider them in determining whether Optio proved its entitlement to enforce the check.

  3. BCH Dev., LLC v. Lakeview Heights Addition Prop. Owners' Ass'n

    No. 05-17-01096-CV (Tex. App. May. 21, 2019)   Cited 8 times

    The party seeking modification has the burden of demonstrating that circumstances require modification of the injunction. In re A.G.F.W., No. 06-12-00111-CV, 2013 WL 2459886, at *3 (Tex. App.—Texarkana June 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.). We review the trial court's ruling on a requested modification for an abuse of discretion.

  4. In re S.V.

    No. 05-18-00037-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2019)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming order modifying a permanent injunction in SAPCR

    Changed circumstances are conditions that alter the status quo after the issuance of an injunction. In re A.G.F.W., No. 06-12-00111-CV, 2013 WL 2459886, at *3 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Jun. 6, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.). The party seeking modification has the burden of demonstrating changed circumstances.

  5. In re Interest of T.L.T.

    No. 05-16-01367-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2018)   Cited 9 times
    Recognizing trial court’s broad discretion to award attorney’s fees in suit for dissolution of marriage

    Husband also tried the issue of attorney's fees by consent when Wife's counsel presented evidence of the fees and Husband did not object. See In re A.G.F.W., No. 06-12-00111-CV, 2013 WL 2459886, *4 (Tex. App.—Texarkana June 6, 2013, no pet.). Because the family code gives a trial court broad discretion in awarding attorney's fees and Wife's counsel proffered undisputed evidence as to his experience, the amount of fees, and the reasonableness of the fees, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the fees, including the appellate attorney's fees.