From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Afzal

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
May 27, 2020
S261122 (Cal. May. 27, 2020)

Opinion

S261122

05-27-2020

AFZAL (MUHAMMAD TAHSEEN) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal]; In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that attack the sufficiency of the evidence]; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)


Summaries of

In re Afzal

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
May 27, 2020
S261122 (Cal. May. 27, 2020)
Case details for

In re Afzal

Case Details

Full title:AFZAL (MUHAMMAD TAHSEEN) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: May 27, 2020

Citations

S261122 (Cal. May. 27, 2020)