From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2017
2016-1756 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1756

03-17-2017

IN RE: AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellant

RYAN MICHAEL SCHULTZ, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM MANSKE. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JOSEPH MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, BRIAN RACILLA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,281.

JUDGMENT

RYAN MICHAEL SCHULTZ, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM MANSKE. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, JOSEPH MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, BRIAN RACILLA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 17, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2017
2016-1756 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)
Case details for

In re Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2017

Citations

2016-1756 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)