From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of A.D.R.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 22, 2016
No. 05-16-01329-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-16-01329-CV

12-22-2016

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.R., A MINOR CHILD


On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-05348

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Justice Stoddart

By letter dated November 14, 2016, the Court notified appellant's counsel that the Court questions its jurisdiction over appellant's appeal of the trial court's October 10, 2016 contempt order. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the Court's concerns within ten days of the date of the letter. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the requested jurisdictional letter may result in dismissal, without further notice, of the appeal. To date, appellant has not filed the requested letter brief or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the Court's jurisdictional concerns.

Generally, appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review contempt orders by way of direct appeal. In re Braden, 483 S.W.3d 659, 662 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.); Tracy v. Tracy, 219 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). Rather, they are reviewable by original proceeding. If the contempt order does not involve confinement, it is reviewable by petition for writ of mandamus. In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam on reh'g).

Appellant's notice of appeal states that she appeals an order holding appellant in contempt for failure to comply with temporary orders regarding visitation. As such, the order is not reviewable by direct appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE 161329F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-05348.
Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang-Miers participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this 22nd day of December, 2016.


Summaries of

In re Interest of A.D.R.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 22, 2016
No. 05-16-01329-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 22, 2016)
Case details for

In re Interest of A.D.R.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.R., A MINOR CHILD

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Dec 22, 2016

Citations

No. 05-16-01329-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 22, 2016)