From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Adam M.C.

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

981 CAF 22-00559

02-02-2024

IN THE MATTER OF ADAM M.C. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; HANANE M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

CHARU NARANG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARY WHITESIDE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.


CHARU NARANG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARY WHITESIDE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joseph G. Nesser, J.), entered March 28, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, inter alia, terminated the parental rights of respondent with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent mother appeals from an order of Family Court (Nesser, J.), following a dispositional hearing, that, inter alia, terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject child on the ground that she severely abused the child. In a prior Family Court Act article 10 proceeding, the court (Romeo, J.) determined, inter alia, that the mother severely abused the subject child (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [i]; Social Services Law § 384-b [8] [a] [i]). We affirm.

Inasmuch as the mother never appealed from the order of disposition in the Family Court Act article 10 proceeding (see Family Ct Act §§ 1052, 1112 [a]), which "clearly advised the mother of her obligation to timely appeal from that order" (Matter of Byler v Byler, 207 A.D.3d 1072, 1076 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 901 [2022]; see § 1113), we conclude that her challenge to the court's determination that she severely abused the subject child as defined by Social Services Law § 384-b (8) (a) (i) is not properly before us (see generally Byler, 207 A.D.3d at 1076).

We have reviewed the mother's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.


Summaries of

In re Adam M.C.

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

In re Adam M.C.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ADAM M.C. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)