Opinion
05-24-00930-CV 05-24-00931-CV05-24-00936-CV 05-24-00937-CV
08-12-2024
IN RE C L ABOR, Relator
Original Proceedings from Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 24-6306-M2, 24-6305-M2, 24-6305-M2BF-A, and 24-6306-M2BF-A
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Before the Court is pro se relator's August 8, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator seeks various declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief against a prosecutor and County Court at Law No. 2 in Rockwall County.
Relator's petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1; Tex.R.App.P. 52.3(a)- (d)(3), (f)-(h), (j), (k)(1)(A); Tex.R.App.P. 52.7. Thus, to the extent relator seeks mandamus relief against the judge who presides over County Court at Law No. 2 in Rockwall County, we deny relator's petition because it does not meet the requirements for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re Guillaume, No. 05-24-00765-CV, 2024 WL 3548511, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas July 26, 2024, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus relief based on relator's failure to comply with several Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).
To the extent relator seeks any other relief, we dismiss relator's petition for want of jurisdiction because the relief sought is not necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Miller, 05-23-00747-CV, 2023 WL 4881394, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas Aug. 1, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (injunctive and declaratory relief); In re Corbello, No. 09-17-00398-CR, 2017 WL 4974623, at *1 (Tex. App.-Beaumont orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (per curiam) (mandamus relief against a prosecutor).