From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Aalyah P.

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON
Feb 3, 2015
No. W2014-01900-COA-R3-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2015)

Opinion

No. W2014-01900-COA-R3-PT

02-03-2015

IN RE AALYAH P.

Vanessa Marie King-Knight, Memphis, Tennessee, pro se. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; Alexander S. Rieger, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Children's Services.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County
No. CT00531313
Robert L. Childers, Judge
The Notice of Appeal was not timely filed, and we therefore have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

ARNOLD B. GOLDIN, J., BRANDON O. GIBSON, J., AND KENNY W. ARMSTRONG, J. Vanessa Marie King-Knight, Memphis, Tennessee, pro se. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; Alexander S. Rieger, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Children's Services. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee provides:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated "MEMORANDUM OPINION", shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.

In this case, it appears that a final order was entered on July 28, 2014, and there is no indication that any of the motions listed in Rule 4(b) were timely filed. Thus, the Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant Vanessa Marie King-Knight should have been filed within thirty days after July 28, 2014. See Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). Appellant, however, did not file a notice of appeal until August 28, 2014, and that date is more than thirty days after July 28, 2014.

By Order entered on January 21, 2015, the Court directed Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to timely file the Notice of Appeal. Appellant filed a response to our Order on February 2, 2015, and stated therein that she inadvertently miscalculated the thirty (30) day time period within which to file her Notice of Appeal.

The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal set forth in Rule 4 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil matters. Albert v. Frye , 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004); Binkley v. Medling , 117 S.W.3d 252, 255 (Tenn. 2003). The Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure expressly prohibit this Court from either waiving or extending that time period. See T.R.A.P. 2 and 21(b). Thus, the failure to timely file a notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter and therefore, this appeal must be dismissed.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss this appeal for failure to timely file the notice of appeal. Costs of this appeal are taxed to the appellant, Vanessa Marie King-Knight, for which execution may issue if necessary.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re Aalyah P.

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON
Feb 3, 2015
No. W2014-01900-COA-R3-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2015)
Case details for

In re Aalyah P.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE AALYAH P.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON

Date published: Feb 3, 2015

Citations

No. W2014-01900-COA-R3-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2015)