Opinion
December 28, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), entered on or about December 23, 1998, which denied petitioner contractor's application to annul respondent City Department of Housing, Preservation and Development's determination revoking petitioner's prequalified status for general contractor work with respondent's Maintenance Division, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Khagednra Gharti-Chhetry, for petitioner-appellant.
Janet L. Zaleon, for respondent-respondent.
Before: Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.
Respondent's determination is supported by ample evidence of petitioner's substandard workmanship and improper behavior by its employees. Petitioner's due process claims are unpreserved (see, Matter of Dowling v. Holland, 245 A.D.2d 167, 170), and in any event without merit (compare, N Y City Charter § 324[b] [procedures for appealing revocation of prequalified status to the agency head Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings], with § 335 [procedures for evidentiary hearing on debarment]; see, Smith Elec. Contrs. v. Fire Dept., 176 A.D.2d 149; Romano Enters. v. New York City Dept. of Transp., 254 A.D.2d 233).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.