From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re W.A.L.

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY
Mar 9, 2015
2015 Ohio 826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. CA2014-10-013

03-09-2015

IN THE MATTER OF: W.A.L.

Richard W. Moyer, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, William C. Randolph, 1025 S. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellee Rose & Dobyns Co., LPA, Blaise Underwood, 97 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellant Virginia Vanden Bosch, 9506 West State Route 73, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, guardian ad litem


DECISION

APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION
Case No. 20133106
Richard W. Moyer, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, William C. Randolph, 1025 S. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellee Rose & Dobyns Co., LPA, Blaise Underwood, 97 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellant Virginia Vanden Bosch, 9506 West State Route 73, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, guardian ad litem Per Curiam .

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, W.L., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re W.A.L.

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY
Mar 9, 2015
2015 Ohio 826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

In re W.A.L.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF: W.A.L.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY

Date published: Mar 9, 2015

Citations

2015 Ohio 826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)