Opinion
No. 217.
Submitted August 1, 2011.
Decided September 22, 2011.
Reported below, 51 AD3d 337.
Motion for a declaration that an automatic stay as to plaintiff Linda Nash is in effect or, alternatively, for a discretionary stay, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion because no appeal or motion for leave to appeal in the Nash action is pending before the Court of Appeals ( see CPLR 5519).
Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judge SMITH.