From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Matter of Pirrotti v. Town of Greenburgh

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County
Oct 28, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 1226 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)

Summary

granting intervenor status to intervening respondents and deeming intervening respondents' cross claims duly filed and served

Summary of this case from Doe v. Zucker

Opinion

October 28, 2009.


Attorney and Client — Disqualification. Parties — Intervention — Interested Party. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 1013 (Parties; intervention by permission).


Summaries of

In Matter of Pirrotti v. Town of Greenburgh

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County
Oct 28, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 1226 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)

granting intervenor status to intervening respondents and deeming intervening respondents' cross claims duly filed and served

Summary of this case from Doe v. Zucker
Case details for

In Matter of Pirrotti v. Town of Greenburgh

Case Details

Full title:Matter of Pirrotti v. Town of Greenburgh

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County

Date published: Oct 28, 2009

Citations

25 Misc. 3d 1226 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52309

Citing Cases

Springs Fire Dist. v. Town of E. Hampton Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Here, Headin East's proposed answer does not assert any affirmative defenses, and no substantial right of the…

Doe v. Zucker

As a result, New York State courts have not required the original plaintiff to re-serve the complaint or…