Opinion
Decided June term, 1869
Charles E. Miller, for the motion.
Richard O'Gorman (corporation counsel), opposed.
That the act was applicable to pending appeals, and was not unconstitutional. The appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Decided June term, 1869
Charles E. Miller, for the motion.
Richard O'Gorman (corporation counsel), opposed.
That the act was applicable to pending appeals, and was not unconstitutional. The appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Full title:In the matter of the petition of COURTLANDT PALMER to vacate an assessment…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 1, 1869
It is the settled law that statutes relating to procedure are retroactive and prospective in their…
Livingston v. LivingstonThat it had the right to do and it is done at nearly every session by Code amendments or otherwise. The power…