Opinion
No. 04-05-00503-CV
Delivered and Filed: April 5, 2006.
Appeal from the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2003-Juv-03094, Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding.
Affirmed.
Sitting: Alma L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, Sandee Bryan MARION, Justice, Rebecca SIMMONS, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
P.A.G. pled guilty to engaging in delinquent conduct based on a charge of criminal mischief and was placed on probation. The State subsequently filed two motions to modify the disposition, alleging P.A.G. violated the conditions of her probation. P.A.G. pled true to the allegations in the first motion to modify and was continued on probation. P.A.G. also pled true to the allegations in the second motion to modify. Following a hearing, the trial court revoked P.A.G.'s probation and ordered her committed to the custody of the Texas Youth Commission.
P.A.G.'s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998) (applying Anders in juvenile proceedings); In re A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d 359, 360-61 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (same). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to P.A.G. and her guardian, who were advised of appellant's right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).