Opinion
No. 3809.
June 3, 2008.
Determination of respondent Commissioner of New York City Department of Sanitation, dated October 17, 2007, terminating respondent's employment as a sanitation worker, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Shirley Werner Kornreich, J], entered June 12, 2007), dismissed, without costs.
Wolin Wolin, Jericho (Alan E. Wolin of counsel), for petitioner.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ann E. Scherzer of counsel), for respondents.
Before: Andrias, J.P., Gonzalez, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.
The finding that petitioner solicited and accepted a gratuity in exchange for collecting trade waste is supported by substantial evidence ( see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182), including the testimony of the undercover investigators who conducted an "integrity test" on petitioner and the audio recording they made of the test. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer's findings of credibility ( cf. Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty of termination does not shock the conscience ( cf. Cranford v Sexton, 159 AD2d 348, 349).