From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Landowitz

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 14, 1937
22 Cal.App.2d 733 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. 1972.

September 14, 1937.

PROCEEDING in Habeas Corpus to secure release from custody. Petitioner discharged.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Edward B. Dienstag and I.M. Peckham for Petitioner.

Matthew Brady, District Attorney, and William J. Connolly, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.

Walter McGovern, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The questions presented in the above matter are essentially the same as those decided in In re Kazas, an application for a writ of habeas corpus, ante, p. 161 [ 70 P.2d 962]; and on the authority thereof the petitioner is discharged.


Summaries of

In re Landowitz

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 14, 1937
22 Cal.App.2d 733 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

In re Landowitz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of CARL LANDOWITZ for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Sep 14, 1937

Citations

22 Cal.App.2d 733 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
71 P.2d 334

Citing Cases

State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners

That minimum prices for the dry cleaning industry cannot be fixed by statute is the established law of this…

International Etc. Workers v. Landowitz

[1a] The superior court held that the complaint failed to state a cause of action upon the ground that the…