(Id., ¶¶ 26-27.) The facts presented in Ryan and the Supreme Court's reasoning for its holding are discussed at length in In re: J.A.R. Barge Lines, CA No. 03-163, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22578 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2005), and will not be reiterated here. Ingram argues that the Special Master erred in this determination concluding that despite the validity of its indemnity claim against Mon River, Ingram was not entitled to recover its litigation expenses, attorneys' fees and costs.