Opinion
No. 45S00-0701-DI-20.
Filed January 22, 2007.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23, section 10(f), petitions this Court to direct respondent to show cause why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this State due to respondent's failure to respond to the Commission's subpoena duces tecum relating to a grievance filed against her, which subpoena was twice sent and received by persons at respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.
This Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, section 10(f), respondent is hereby directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this State due to her failure to respond to the Disciplinary Commission's subpoena duces tecum.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to serve a certified copy of this Order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to her personally, or by sending to her a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Should service not be obtained as outlined above, the Clerk of this Court shall complete service pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, section 12(h).
The Clerk of this Court is further directed to provide notice of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and its attorney of record.
DONE at Indianapolis, Indiana, this 22nd day of January, 2007.