Opinion
23611, 23612, 23613.
November 21, 2000.
Appeal from the Family Court of the First Circuit (FC-S Nos. 97-04815, 97-04816, 97-04817).
MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, RAMIL, and ACOBA, JJ.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS BY FATHER-APPELLANT
Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) father-appellant's right to appeal the May 26, 2000 permanent custody orders entered in FC-S Nos. 97-04815, 97-04816 and 97-04817 was conditioned upon the filing by father-appellant of motions for reconsideration of the May 26, 2000 orders; see HRS § 571-54; In re Jane Doe, 77 Haw. 109, 113, 883 P.2d 30, 34 (1994); In re Jane Doe, 3 Haw. App. 391, 394, 651 P.2d 492, 494 (1982); (2) no motions for reconsideration were filed by father-appellant; (3) the motions for reconsideration filed on May 26, 2000 by mother-appellant sought reconsideration of the May 26, 2000 orders only as to mother-appellant and the record of the reconsideration hearing indicates that the May 26, 2000 orders were reconsidered by the family court only as to mother-appellant; and, thus, (4) the jurisdictional requirements for appeal have not been met as to father-appellant and we lack jurisdiction over father-appellant's appeals. HRS § 571-54. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeals by father-appellant are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.