From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Interest of B.A.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 21, 2010
No. 04-10-00004-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2010)

Opinion

No. 04-10-00004-CV

Delivered and Filed: July 21, 2010.

Appealed from the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00256, Honorable Richard H. Garcia, Judge Presiding.

Affirmed.

Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Derrick O. seeks to appeal the trial court's termination of his parental rights to his minor child, B.A.H., and challenges the trial court's finding that his appeal is frivolous. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(d)(3), (g) (Vernon 2008). Derrick's court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief representing that he has conducted a professional evaluation of the record and determined the appellate points are without merit. Counsel concludes the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.-San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.). In compliance with the procedure in Anders, counsel delivered a copy of counsel's brief to Derrick, who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file his own pro se brief if he disagreed with counsel's determination regarding the merits of the appeal. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.). No pro se brief was filed. Derrick's attorney has also filed a motion to withdraw.

To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the child by initials and the child's father by his first name only. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2008).

We have reviewed the record on appeal and counsel's brief, and we agree that the appellate points do not present a substantial question for appellate review, and are therefore frivolous. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003(b) (Vernon 2002); see also TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(d)(3) (incorporating section 13.003(b) by reference). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment, and grant appellate counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 85-86.


Summaries of

In Interest of B.A.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 21, 2010
No. 04-10-00004-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2010)
Case details for

In Interest of B.A.H.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.H., a Minor Child

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 21, 2010

Citations

No. 04-10-00004-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2010)