Opinion
Case No. 3:10-CV-3746 SI
10-13-2011
IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant.
Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971) Robert J. Kent (SBN 250905) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Christopher O. Green ( admitted pro hac vice ) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Attorneys for Defendant, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777) George F. Bishop (SBN 89205) Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303) William P. Nelson (SBN 196091) HOSIE RICE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff, IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.
Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971)
Robert J. Kent (SBN 250905)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Christopher O. Green (admitted pro hac vice)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777)
George F. Bishop (SBN 89205)
Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303)
William P. Nelson (SBN 196091)
HOSIE RICE LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff, IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.
JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Implicit Networks, Inc. ("Implicit") and Defendant and Counterclaimant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record identified below, submit this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Subsections 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c).
Whereas Implicit and HP have agreed to dismiss without prejudice all claims and counterclaims in this Action seeking relief with respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,324,685, 6,976,248 and 7,774,740 (collectively the "Application Server Patents"), but not to dismiss any other claims in the Complaint or Counterclaim, the Parties hereby jointly submit this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice.
Accordingly, Implicit and HP stipulate and agree to, and hereby do, dismiss without prejudice:
(1) From Implicit's First Amended Complaint (D.I. #24), only the claim identified following and no others:
Count II - PATENT INFRINGEMENT (Application Server Patents);(2) From HP's Counterclaims (D.I. 31), only the counterclaims identified below and no others:
In its entirety: Count IV License;
Only to the extent the following counts seek relief with respect to the Application Server Patents: Count I Declaratory Relief Regarding Non-Infringement, Count II, Declaratory Relief Regarding Invalidity, Count VI Declaratory Relief Regarding Damages and Count V Exceptional Case.
Implicit and HP stipulate and agree, further, that no claim or counterclaim seeking relief with respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,629,163 or 7,711,857 (collectively named the "Dynamic Data Flow Patents" in the Complaint) is dismissed hereby.
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
Christopher O. Green
Attorney for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Judge Susan Illston
HOSIE RICE LLP
George F. Bishop
Attorney for Plaintiff IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.
DECLARATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Hewlett-Packard Company counsel.
HOSIE RICE LLP
George F. Bishop
Attorney for Plaintiff IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.