From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH
Oct 17, 2011
No. C09-01973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C09-01973 EDL

10-17-2011

DANIEL IMPEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

DAVID J. BECHT MICHAEL SACHS MYTHILY SIVARAJAH ADAMS | NYE | BECHT LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL IMPEY MTCHAEL E BREWER GREGORY ISKANDER LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendant OFFICE DEPOT, INC.


DAVID J. BECHT, SBN 104208

dbecht@adamsnyeemployment.com

MICHAEL SACHS, SBN 235048

msachs@adamsnyeemployment. com

MYTHILY SIVARAJAH, SBN 252494

msivarajah@adamsnyeemployment. com

ADAMS | NYE | BECHT | LLP

222 Kearny Street, Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94108-4521

Telephone: (415) 982-8955

Facsimile: (415) 982-2042

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

DANIEL IMPEY

MICHAEL E. BREWER, SBN 177912

mbrewer@littler. com

GREGORY ISKANDER, SBN 200215

giskander@littler. com

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

Treat Towers

1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600

Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Telephone: 925.932.2468

Facsimile: 925.946.9809

Attorneys for Defendant,

OFFICE DEPOT. INC.

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR

WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENDANT'S BILL OF

COSTS AND ORDER TAXING COSTS;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Judge: Elizabeth Laporte

WHEREAS, the Court entered final judgment in this action on September 19, 2011;

WHEREAS, on October 3, 2011, Defendant filed and served its Bill of Costs;

WHEREAS, Local Rule 54-2(a) provides that the party against whom costs are claimed, has 14 days in which to serve and file any objections to the Bill of Costs;

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties met and conferred in good faith regarding Defendant's Bill of Costs and reached an agreement, whereby Defendant was to its Bill of Costs in exchange for Plaintiff waving his right to pursue any appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in this matter;

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011, Defendant was about to withdraw its Bill of Costs;

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011, the Clerk taxed costs against Plaintiff;

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the Court strike the Order taxing costs against Plaintiff, entered on October 14, 2011.

The parties further stipulate and request that: Defendant's Bill of Costs is withdrawn.

In exchange, Plaintiff agrees to refrain from and otherwise waive his right to pursue any appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in this matter.

It is further understood and agreed that this agreement is not intended to affect the judgment as entered on September 19, 2011, which judgment shall stand.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

DAVID J. BECHT

MICHAEL SACHS

MYTHILY SIVARAJAH

ADAMS | NYE | BECHT LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DANIEL IMPEY

MTCHAEL E BREWER

GREGORY ISKANDER

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendant

OFFICE DEPOT, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH
Oct 17, 2011
No. C09-01973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL IMPEY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. C09-01973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)