From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 14, 2010
Case No. C 09-1973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. C 09-1973 EDL.

June 14, 2010


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT OFFICE DEPOT, INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO DISCLOSE REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESSES AND EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY


Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, Defendant Office Depot, Inc. filed this motion for administrative relief, requesting an order extending time to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses in the above-captioned action from June 16, 2010 to July 9, 2010. While Plaintiff is correct that Defendant should have been more proactive, on balance the Court finds good cause and hereby grants Defendant's motion and orders as follows:

The deadline for disclosing rebuttal expert witnesses is extended to July 9, 2010. The expert discovery cutoff is extended to August 6, 2010. In addition, should Plaintiff consent to submit to a psychiatric examination by Defendant's expert witness, said expert witness shall have ten days following the examination to submit a written report, and Plaintiff may depose Defendant's expert thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 14, 2010
Case No. C 09-1973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL IMPEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., and DOES…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 14, 2010

Citations

Case No. C 09-1973 EDL (N.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Lopez v. City of Imperial

Factors that courts have considered in assessing whether "good cause" exists include, but are not limited to,…

Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tenn.

Juarez v. Autozone Stores, Inc., No. 08cv417-L (BLM), 2011 WL 1532070, at *1 (S.D. Cal. 2011); Impey v. …