From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imperial Chemical Industries v. Mossinghoff

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 1985
767 F.2d 897 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Opinion

Appeal No. 84-1095.

July 17, 1985.

Lawrence A. Hymo, Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., argued for appellants. With him on brief were Paul N. Kokulis and William T. Bullinger, Washington, D.C.

Fred W. Sherling, Associate Solicitor, U.S. Patent Trademark Office, Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on brief were Joseph F. Nakamura, Solicitor, New York City, and Jere W. Sears, Deputy Solicitor, Washington, D.C.

Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Columbia; John H. Pratt, Judge.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and SMITH, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

A motion has been filed by a nonparty for publication of the court's opinion in this appeal which was disposed of by an unpublished opinion on February 15, 1985, 765 F.2d 160. The motion is based on the movant's having received an Official Action of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) which cites as authority the district court's decision from which this appeal was taken, and concern that the PTO might continue to cite that district court decision.

The PTO was supplied a copy of this court's February 15, 1985 opinion. That this court reversed the decision of the district court will be reported in Federal Reporter 2d. It can be presumed that the PTO will not cite as authority a decision of a district court that has been reversed on appeal.

The motion is, accordingly, denied.


Summaries of

Imperial Chemical Industries v. Mossinghoff

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 1985
767 F.2d 897 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Imperial Chemical Industries v. Mossinghoff

Case Details

Full title:IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GERALD J…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 1985

Citations

767 F.2d 897 (Fed. Cir. 1985)