From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 12, 1934
171 A. 795 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1934 —

Decided April 12, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 27.

For the respondent, Kalisch Kalisch.

For the appellant, Frank G. Turner.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 12, 1934
171 A. 795 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Imperato v. Concord Casualty and Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:PASQUALE IMPERATO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 12, 1934

Citations

171 A. 795 (N.J. 1934)
171 A. 795