From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impastato v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the plaintiffs commenced this action after the expiration of the applicable limitations period ( see, Public Authorities Law § 1276), the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint ( see, Burgess v Long Is. R.R. Auth., 79 N.Y.2d 777). Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the defendants' service of a notice for an oral examination of the plaintiffs did not toll the limitations period ( see, Rose v. Metro N. Commuter R.R., 143 A.D.2d 993, 994; Simon v. Capital Dist. Transp. Auth., 95 A.D.2d 902; see also, Stillman v. New Jersey Tr., 224 A.D.2d 348). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Impastato v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Impastato v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority

Case Details

Full title:MARIANNA IMPASTATO et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 362