Opinion
Decided November 16, 2000.
Appeal from 1st Dept: 261 A.D.2d 262.
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Decided November 16, 2000.
Appeal from 1st Dept: 261 A.D.2d 262.
Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Full title:IMO Industries Inc. et al., Appellants, v. Alvis PLC, c. et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 16, 2000
RAG's fraud claim was also properly sustained. Unlike Varo, Inc. v. Alvis PLC ( 261 A.D.2d 262, lv denied sub…
Project Gamma Acquisition Corp. v. PPG Indus.Here, the alleged fraudulent representations, on which plaintiffs claim to have relied, are the very…