I/M/O Bid Solicitation #11-X-21295, Sec. Guard Servs.—— Armed, & Unarmed, New Jersey Statewide

Full title: I/M/O BID SOLICITATION #11-X-21295, SECURITY GUARD SERVICES — ARMED…

Court: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

DOCKET NO. A-5859-10T4 (App. Div. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-5859-10T4

01-10-2012

I/M/O BID SOLICITATION #11-X-21295, SECURITY GUARD SERVICES — ARMED AND UNARMED, NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE

Sills, Cummis & Gross, P.C., attorneys for appellant Security Guard, Inc., d/b/a Tri-County Security, NJ. Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C., attorneys for respondent Securitas Security Services U.S.A., Inc. Paula T. Dow, Attorney General, attorney for respondent New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Purchase and Property. Winne, Banta, Hetherington, Basralian & Kahn, P.C., attorneys for respondent Protection Plus Security Corp.

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Before Judges Sabatino, Ashrafi, and Fasciale.

On appeal from the Division of Purchase and Property, Department of Treasury.

Sills, Cummis & Gross, P.C., attorneys for appellant Security Guard, Inc., d/b/a Tri-County Security, NJ.

Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C., attorneys for respondent Securitas Security Services U.S.A., Inc.

Paula T. Dow, Attorney General, attorney for respondent New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Purchase and Property.

Winne, Banta, Hetherington, Basralian & Kahn, P.C., attorneys for respondent Protection Plus Security Corp. PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument that the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal by Security Guard, Inc., d/b/a Tri-County Security, NJ. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The dismissal does not affect the related appeals in A-2608-10, A-5965-10, and A-0894-11.