From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Immigrant Rights Def. Council, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2017
Case No. CV 17-1710-PLA (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-1710-PLA

11-21-2017

IMMIGRANT RIGHTS DEFENSE COUNCIL, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order granting in part and denying in part the Motion for Summary Judgment of plaintiff IMMIGRANT RIGHTS DEFENSE COUNCIL, LLC ("Plaintiff"), and granting in part and denying in part the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendant HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY ("Defendant") (ECF No. 26). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

The Court finds and declares that plaintiff is entitled to recover the fees and costs awarded to it in the Underlying Prosecution from the bond that defendant issued on Lord's behalf. Accordingly, defendant is ordered to pay plaintiff $36,085, plus pre-judgment interest at a rate of 7% per annum. The pre-judgment interest to which plaintiff is entitled shall have a commencement date of December 2, 2016, and shall run until the date on which defendant satisfies the judgment in this case. Dated: November 21, 2017

/s/_________

Paul L. Abrams

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Immigrant Rights Def. Council, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2017
Case No. CV 17-1710-PLA (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Immigrant Rights Def. Council, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IMMIGRANT RIGHTS DEFENSE COUNCIL, LLC, a California limited liability…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 17-1710-PLA (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2017)

Citing Cases

Immigrant Rights Def. Council v. Hudson Ins. Co.

To conclude that appellant was nonetheless entitled to recover attorney fees from the bond, the magistrate…