From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

iMed Tech. v. Teleflex, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-01861-E-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-01861-E-BK

05-01-2020

IMED TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiff, v. TELEFLEX, INC; TELEFLEX MEDICAL, INC.; ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.; TELEFLEX MEDICAL EUROPE, LTD.; and TELEFLEX MEDICAL EUROPE SRL, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 22). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. This Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 7). This action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed May 1, 2020.

/s/_________

ADA BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

iMed Tech. v. Teleflex, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-01861-E-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2020)
Case details for

iMed Tech. v. Teleflex, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IMED TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiff, v. TELEFLEX, INC; TELEFLEX MEDICAL, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-01861-E-BK (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2020)