From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imbrunone v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 15, 2001
793 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-1464

Opinion filed August 15, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.


Aaron Imbrunone appeals the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Imbrunone styled his submission as a motion to correct illegal sentence, but he filed it pursuant to rule 3.850, met the pleading requirements of rule 3.850, and sought relief only available pursuant to rule 3.850. The circuit court, noting that the motion sought relief underHeggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), treated the motion as one filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a) and denied it. We affirm without comment the denial of Imbrunone's claim that he is entitled to Heggs resentencing. However, the circuit court failed to address the portion of the motion in which Imbrunone sought to withdraw his original plea. That aspect of the motion was facially sufficient. We reverse and remand for the circuit court to consider it.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

FULMER, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Imbrunone v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 15, 2001
793 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Imbrunone v. State

Case Details

Full title:AARON IMBRUNONE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 15, 2001

Citations

793 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)