From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imberman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Apr 6, 2023
No. 20-61998-CIV-SMITH (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

20-61998-CIV-SMITH

04-06-2023

ARTHUR IMBERMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RODNEY SMITH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [DE 31]. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 19] be denied, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 20] be granted, and that the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge be affirmed.

After review and evaluation, the Magistrate Judge found that the ALJ satisfied her duty to develop a full and fair record and that Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving that he is disabled. Furthermore, the ALJ did not err in finding that Plaintiff did not meet or equal a Listing. Based on the record, the Magistrate judge found that the substantial evidence supports the ALJ's conclusion that Plaintiff's visual impairment does not meet or equal a Listing. Thus, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the ALJ's decision be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, and that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Pursuant to the Local Rules for the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, the Magistrate Judge ordered “[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation, any party may serve and file written objections to . . . findings and recommendations.” Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); S.D. Fla. Mag. R. 4(b).) Neither party has filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed, de novo, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to District Judge and the record, and given that Plaintiff has filed no Objections, it is

ORDERED that:

1) The Report and Recommendation to District Judge [DE 31] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this Court's Order.
2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 19] is DENIED.
3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 20] is GRANTED.
4) The Decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED.
5) This case is CLOSED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Imberman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Apr 6, 2023
No. 20-61998-CIV-SMITH (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Imberman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR IMBERMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

No. 20-61998-CIV-SMITH (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2023)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. O'Malley

Hutchison v. Bowen, 787 F.2d 1461, 1463 (11th Cir. 1986) (holding an ALJ's implicit finding that claimant did…