From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Illinois Ins. Exchange v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 10, 1997
696 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 1997)

Opinion

No. 89,124

July 10, 1997

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions Third District — Case No. 96-482 (Dade County).

Hinda Klein of Conroy, Simberg Ganon, P.A., Hollywood, Florida, for Petitioners.

Jacqueline G. Emanuel of Riley Knoerr, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondents.


We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Illinois Insurance Exchange v. Scottsdale Insurance Co., 679 So.2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), based upon conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After hearing oral argument, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and accordingly dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion.


I would accept jurisdiction in this case. Based on the facts set forth in its opinion, I believe the court below erroneously characterized the respondent as an excess insurer rather than as a primary insurer. Because both parties were primary insurers, the decision below was in direct conflict withContinental Casualty Co. v. United Pacific Insurance Co., 637 So.2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).


Summaries of

Illinois Ins. Exchange v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 10, 1997
696 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 1997)
Case details for

Illinois Ins. Exchange v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ILLINOIS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, ET AL., PETITIONERS, vs. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 10, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 1997)