From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ilarraza v. Kerestes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-cv-2257 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-cv-2257

03-16-2016

JULIO E. ILARRAZA, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT KERESTES, et al, Defendants.


(Rambo, J)
()

MEMORANDUM

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration (Doc. 27) of our order (Doc. 18) denying the appointment of counsel and his recent motion for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 28).

The plaintiff requests counsel this time because his English is not good and he is unable to afford counsel. For the reasons set forth in our Memoranda dated December 7, 2015 (Doc. 13) and December 10, 2015 (Doc. 17), the motions will be denied without prejudice.

In the event that future proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter may be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of the plaintiff.

A separate Order follows.

/s/_________

JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge Dated: March 16, 2016


Summaries of

Ilarraza v. Kerestes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-cv-2257 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Ilarraza v. Kerestes

Case Details

Full title:JULIO E. ILARRAZA, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT KERESTES, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-cv-2257 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2016)