Opinion
2:22-CV-02134-RFB-EJY
02-10-2023
IGT, a Nevada corporation; and ACRES GAMING INCORPORATED, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN F. ACRES, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.
David A. Carroll, Esq. (NSB #7643) Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. (NSB #10875) Robert E. Opdyke, Esq. (NSB #12841) RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs IGT and Acres Gaming Incorporated Eric R. Olsen, Esq. (NSB #3127) Jared M. Sechrist, Esq. (NSB #10439) Attorneys for Defendant John F. Acres
David A. Carroll, Esq. (NSB #7643) Anthony J. DiRaimondo, Esq. (NSB #10875) Robert E. Opdyke, Esq. (NSB #12841) RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN & CARROLL, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs IGT and Acres Gaming Incorporated
Eric R. Olsen, Esq. (NSB #3127) Jared M. Sechrist, Esq. (NSB #10439) Attorneys for Defendant John F. Acres
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR (1) IGT AND ACRES GAMING INC. TO FILE THEIR REPLY TO MOTION TO REMAND (FIRST REQUEST) AND (2) JOHN F. ACRES TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, the undersigned Parties, by and through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a reply in support of the Motion to Remand (First Request), which was filed on January 20, 2023 (ECF No. 10), and the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (Second Request).
1. On December 22, 2022, Defendant removed this action (ECF No. 1).
2. Pursuant to Stipulation and Order, entered January 10, 2023 (ECF No. 6), Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was extended by thirty (30) days and is currently due February 13, 2023. It is agreed that Defendant shall have an additional extension, up to and including February 20, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
3. On January 20, 2023, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10). Defendant filed its response on February 3, 2023 (ECF No. 14). Plaintiffs' reply brief is currently due on February 10, 2023. It is agreed that Plaintiffs shall have additional time, up to and including February 17, 2023, to file their reply in support of the Motion to Remand.
4. There is good cause to permit the foregoing extensions and they are not sought for any improper purpose or to create delay. The extensions are requested to accommodate attorney travel schedules and commitments in other matters.
Respectfully submitted, GARMAN TURNER GORDON LLP
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.