From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ignatova v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 29, 2023
No. 22-62103-CIV-SINGHAL (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2023)

Opinion

22-62103-CIV-SINGHAL

08-29-2023

SVETLANA IGNATOVA, Petitioner, v. UR M. JADDOU, et al., Respondents.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (DE [11]) and the Report and Recommendation (DE [15]) of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Motion be granted. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (DE [15]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (DE [11]) is GRANTED. Petitioner Svetlana Ignatova's claims pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and her claims pursuant to the Mandamus Act and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Petitioner has fourteen (14) days to file an amended complaint asserting only those allegations relevant to her APA claim.


Summaries of

Ignatova v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 29, 2023
No. 22-62103-CIV-SINGHAL (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Ignatova v. Jaddou

Case Details

Full title:SVETLANA IGNATOVA, Petitioner, v. UR M. JADDOU, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Aug 29, 2023

Citations

No. 22-62103-CIV-SINGHAL (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2023)

Citing Cases

Ferre v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Defendants argue that Plaintiffs' Mandamus Act claim should be dismissed for lack of subject matter…