From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iglesias v. City of Goodyear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 29, 2012
No. CV 11-01891-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-01891-PHX-FJM

10-29-2012

Julio Iglesias, Plaintiff, v. The City of Goodyear, Defendant.


ORDER

We have before us plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff (doc. 98) and defendant's response (doc. 99). Plaintiff did not reply.

Plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw is premature. In a previous order (doc. 97), we denied plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw (doc. 87) noting that plaintiff would be prejudiced if his lawyer withdraws while the response to the motion for summary judgment is pending. We advised plaintiff's counsel that he could file a renewed motion to withdraw along with his response to the pending motion. Because plaintiff's counsel has not filed a response to the motion for summary judgment, we will not consider the renewed motion to withdraw at this time.

IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw (doc. 98). Counsel may file a renewed motion to withdraw concurrently with his response to the motion for summary judgment.

__________________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Iglesias v. City of Goodyear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 29, 2012
No. CV 11-01891-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Iglesias v. City of Goodyear

Case Details

Full title:Julio Iglesias, Plaintiff, v. The City of Goodyear, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-01891-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2012)