From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ifill v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 12, 2008
277 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1599.

Submitted: April 28, 2008.

Decided: May 12, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01393-LMB).

Francis H. Koh, Koh Law Firms, LLC, North Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Roberto Ifill appeals the district court's order granting the Postmaster General's summary judgment motion on If ill's hostile work environment and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ifill v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01393 (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ifill v. Potter

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 12, 2008
277 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ifill v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:Roberto IFILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

277 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2008)