From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ifill v. Carruthers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2015
134 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-01-2015

In re Dr. Richard Sunday IFILL, Petitioner, v. Hon. Richard D. CARRUTHERS, etc., et al., Respondents.


Opinion

Dr. Richard Sunday Ifill, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Richard D. Carruthers, respondent.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rachel Ehrhardt of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ifill v. Carruthers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2015
134 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Ifill v. Carruthers

Case Details

Full title:In re Dr. Richard Sunday IFILL, Petitioner, v. Hon. Richard D. CARRUTHERS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8792
19 N.Y.S.3d 726