Ifil v. Bishop Corp. Solutions

Full title: WILLIS IFIL, Plaintiff, v. BISHOP CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Case No. 2:10-cv-02010-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-02010-JCM-PAL

10-24-2011

WILLIS IFIL, Plaintiff, v. BISHOP CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, Defendant.

PEGGY A. LEEN

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #23) filed on October 18, 2011. On October 4, 2011, the court entered a Scheduling Order (Dkt. #22) because the parties failed to submit a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance with Local Rule 26-1. The parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #23) requests 296 days to complete discovery which is substantially more time than the 180 days deemed presumptively reasonable by Local Rule 26-1(e). Additionally, the parties proposed plan does not comply with the requirements of LR 26-1(e) which requires that any request for special scheduling review provide a statement of reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #23) is not approved and is DENIED, and the deadlines established in the court's Scheduling Order (Dkt. #22) shall apply.

PEGGY A. LEEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE