From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Idcastrcam Consumer Products, LLC v. Suncast Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 8, 2008
Case No. 1:07 cv 2692 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07 cv 2692.

January 8, 2008


ORDER


On 12/14/2007, this Court notified plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel that unless good cause is shown for failure to serve defendant as provided under the rules, this action would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Upon review of the docket, there has been no good cause shown and no service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant in this matter. Therefore,

Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the above entitled case is hereby dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Idcastrcam Consumer Products, LLC v. Suncast Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 8, 2008
Case No. 1:07 cv 2692 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Idcastrcam Consumer Products, LLC v. Suncast Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Idcastrcam Consumer products, LLC Plaintiff. v. Suncast Corporation…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:07 cv 2692 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)