Iannone v. J.C. Penney Company

Full title: DONNA IANNONE, Plaintiff, v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 6, 2007

Civil Action No. 05-710 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-710.

June 6, 2007

ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 6^th day of June, 2007, after the plaintiff, Donna Iannone, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Joint Motion for Preclusion of Expert Testimony and a Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 17], was submitted by the defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections and the response to those objections, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Joint Motion for Preclusion of Expert Testimony is denied, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.