Opinion
Argued June 7, 1911
Decided June 16, 1911
Rosario Maggio for appellant.
Bertrand L. Pettigrew for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, HISCOCK and COLLIN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Iandiorio v. American Silk Dyeing and Finishing Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1911
96 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1911)
Summaries of
Iandiorio v. American Silk Dyeing and Finishing Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1911
96 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for
Iandiorio v. American Silk Dyeing and Finishing Company
Case Details
Full title:GIUSEPPE IANDIORIO, as Administrator of the Estate of GIUSEPPE MAFFEI…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 16, 1911
Citations
96 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1911)
96 N.E. 1117