From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iacoponelli v. Le Blanc

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 1960
123 So. 2d 648 (La. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

No. 153.

October 24, 1960.

Proceeding on motion to dismiss appeal from the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, John C. Boutall, J. The Court of Appeal held that since there was nothing in record from which it could determine whether judgment was rendered after expiration of term of court as charged, or whether there was an agreement that it might be so rendered, and there was nothing from which court could determine when term of court terminated and this information was necessary for consideration of motion to dismiss, matter would be remanded for such action as was necessary to supply information.

Remanded.

Waverly A. Henning, Gretna, for plaintiff-appellee.

Racivitch, Johnson, Wegmann Mouledoux, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.


This matter is before us on motion of appellee to dismiss the suspensive appeal on the ground that the order of appeal was not applied for and was not granted until 27 days after the judgment was rendered and signed.

In answer to this motion appellant prays that the judgment be declared an absolute nullity for the reason that it was rendered after the term of court during which the matter was tried, and, in the alternative, appellant prays that the motion to dismiss be overruled for the reason that, though the matter was tried and taken under advisement by the court, no notice of judgment was later served on defendant-appellant as is required by LSA-R.S. 13:3344.

That the judgment be declared a nullity for the reason that it was rendered after the termination of the term of court is a matter which could be disposed of only on the hearing of the appeal if it is not to be dismissed, or on a direct action to annul the judgment if the appeal is to be dismissed.

There is nothing in this record from which we can determine whether the judgment was rendered after the expiration of the term of court or whether there was an agreement that it might be rendered, if it was so rendered after the expiration of the term. Nor is there anything in the record from which we can determine when the term of court terminated. This information is necessary for consideration of the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson for such action as may be necessary to supply this information.

Remanded.


Summaries of

Iacoponelli v. Le Blanc

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Oct 24, 1960
123 So. 2d 648 (La. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Iacoponelli v. Le Blanc

Case Details

Full title:Emile IACOPONELLI v. Maurice J. LE BLANC

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 24, 1960

Citations

123 So. 2d 648 (La. Ct. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Iacoponelli v. Le Blanc

SAMUEL, Judge. This matter is before us for the second time on a motion to dismiss a suspensive appeal. It…

Columbia Finance Corporation v. Robitcheck

The sweeping language of this section makes it clear that, with certain minor exceptions not pertinent here,…