From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyundai Mobis Co. v. Autoliv Asp, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2017
2016-1896 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1896

03-07-2017

HYUNDAI MOBIS CO., LTD., MOBIS ALABAMA, L.L.C., Appellants v. AUTOLIV ASP, INC., Appellee

PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by ANDREW JOHN PINCUS, JONATHAN WEINBERG. KEITH E. BROYLES, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WESLEY ACHEY, PAMELA COUNCILL.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-01005.

JUDGMENT

PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by ANDREW JOHN PINCUS, JONATHAN WEINBERG. KEITH E. BROYLES, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by WESLEY ACHEY, PAMELA COUNCILL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O'MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 7, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Hyundai Mobis Co. v. Autoliv Asp, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 7, 2017
2016-1896 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Hyundai Mobis Co. v. Autoliv Asp, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HYUNDAI MOBIS CO., LTD., MOBIS ALABAMA, L.L.C., Appellants v. AUTOLIV ASP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2017

Citations

2016-1896 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2017)