From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyslop v. Lasusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2005
21 A.D.3d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-09560.

September 19, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Mahopac Central School District and Catherine White appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated October 8, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Uniondale, N.Y. (Christine Gasser and Kathleen D. Foley of counsel), for appellants.

Stanley N. Kutcher, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Ronald Cohen of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before: Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are questions of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment ( see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).


Summaries of

Hyslop v. Lasusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2005
21 A.D.3d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Hyslop v. Lasusa

Case Details

Full title:JEANNETTE HYSLOP et al., Respondents, v. CATHERINE LASUSA, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6773
800 N.Y.S.2d 849