From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyser v. VanNatta

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana
Oct 24, 2006
Cause No. 3:06-cv-274 ts (N.D. Ind. Oct. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Cause No. 3:06-cv-274 ts.

October 24, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


Terry P. Hyser, a pro se prisoner, filed this habeas corpus petition attempting to challenge his forty-five day loss of good time on December 27, 2005, in case MCF 05-12-0264 by the Disciplinary Hearing Board (DHB) at the Miami Correctional Facility.

Mr. Hyser states that he appealed the ruling to the superintendent who, on January 20, 2006, reduced the forty-five day loss of good time to thirty days suspended. Petition at ¶ 9(b), DE 1-1; see also DE 1-2 at 2. That is to say, Mr. Hyser appealed and won; his good time was restored. The sole remedy available in this case has been rendered moot because Mr. Hyser's good time credits have already been restored. A prison disciplinary proceeding can only be challenged where it results in the lengthening of the duration of confinement. Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003). Here, it did not, and this case must be dismissed. See Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4 ("If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner.").

For the foregoing reasons, the court DISMISSES the petition WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DISCHARGES the respondent from any obligation to respond to this court's order to show cause.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Hyser v. VanNatta

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana
Oct 24, 2006
Cause No. 3:06-cv-274 ts (N.D. Ind. Oct. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Hyser v. VanNatta

Case Details

Full title:TERRY P. HYSER, Petitioner, v. JOHN VanNATTA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana

Date published: Oct 24, 2006

Citations

Cause No. 3:06-cv-274 ts (N.D. Ind. Oct. 24, 2006)